Don’t Analyze, Act!

I’ve heard a few things about Barbara Ehrenreich’s book, “Bright Sided“, though I haven’t read it.   But the idea has intrigued me, because it’s the idea that our world of positive thinking is too much, and it’s somewhat dangerous.  She says that when someone gets cancer, and is told that positive thinking can heal them, they’re lying in a very cruel and dangerous way to those people.  And really, they’re blaming that person for not being positive enough.  If they don’t get better, it’s then their fault, for not keeping up that sunny disposition all of the time.  This reminds me of those who say some variation of, “God never gives you more than you can handle”.  This idea has always bugged the crap out of me.  If I were weaker, less strong, would my life be easier?  Would my mom still be alive?  No, I seriously doubt it.  Weak people have problems, too.   But the idea that God won’t give you more than you can handle is stupid.  People commit suicide every day.  People drink and do drugs and abuse their children, every single day.  They don’t do these things for fun.  They do them because life is too damn hard, and they can’t handle it.

Another part of her theory is that keeping this bright disposition at all times, sort of like Candide, the idea that things always happen for a reason, that this is the best of all possible worlds…it breeds a sort of intellectual laziness, where instead of thinking things through, analyzing and figuring out possible solutions or better ways to live in our world, we accept what is going on around us.  I think we are made, by God or by Nature, smarter than that.  We are made to question the world that we live in.  We should think about what we read, what we see, what we hear, and put it in the context of our world.  Don’t blindly accept what anyone tells you.  ANYONE.  As they say, “Question Authority”.  Yes indeed.  Please.

She argues that not only is this practice dangerous to the individual, it is dangerous to the culture as well.  If we decide to act without thinking, to accept ideas without putting them to the rigorous tests of our minds, we start to accept dangerous ideas and thoughts.  Ideas that get us into wars we don’t need to be in.  Ideas that get people killed.  Ideas that destroy economies, crash stock markets, because we are so willing to believe what we want to believe, we don’t take the time to stop and think things through.  Instead of thinking first, then acting, we decide to act, rather than think.

Reminds me of a personal story, when we had our house on the market.  Things were starting to crash in the market, but we didn’t realize how badly quite yet, and we were unwilling to drop our price as much as our realtor’s boss said we should.  He came by to talk some sense into us, sat down and told us, “Don’t analyze, act!”.  We were worried.  Worried that if we were to lower our price, and not be able to get a lower price on the other side, we would be in big financial trouble.  Worried that it would be foolish to get in over our heads.  Instead of reassuring us that we would make contingency plans, plans that would guarantee that we would not doom ourselves and ruin our financial nest egg, he said, “Don’t analyze, act!”.   Grrr.  Thankfully, we dropped him.  It meant firing our agent in the process, which sucked, as she is a neighbor and a friend.  But we couldn’t bear the idea of him getting a penny of our money.   And if we had sold then, we might have been able to get a deal on the buying side, and we might not have.  But our mortgage would have gone up quite a bit, and with Ted and I both losing our jobs within 7 months of each other, I don’t think we would have been able to afford the higher price.  We would have been in deep shit, as they say.   We might have lost our home.  So I, for one, and thankful that we were more willing to analyze, to think before we acted.

And while I agree with looking for the bright side of things, I agree that always dwelling on the dark side of life is dangerous and depressing and wrong, I still think that it’s also equally fair to be angry when things don’t go right.  If you get laid off from your job, or if you get cancer, or if someone you love is suffering, you don’t have to go around with an idiotic smile on your face.  Be angry.  Be sad.  Grieve for what should have been.  Don’t let the wounds fester and kill you and make you into someone you don’t want to be, but be angry while appropriate.  I agree with that.  I believe in being angry.  Being mad.  Getting over it, and moving on.  But that anger is a real emotion, and should not be glossed over in favor of looking on the sunny side of life, if for that time at least, you can’t find it.  Who knows, perhaps you might even be able to think for yourself, and decide how you want to feel.  Or at least, how you actually feel, whether you want to or not.

Barbara Ehrenreich was interviewed on our local PBS station, on a show called Forum.  You can hear the interview here.

9 Comments

  • Starshine

    I agree. Sometimes in order to feel happy again, you must grieve first. Sometimes, in order to forgive, you must feel the weight of the anguish another has caused you. Sometimes, in order to heal you must spend time with the injury to understand the right course of action for healing.

    Well articulated thoughts, friend.

  • JMc

    There is a lot of solace in sitting with the pain, walking through it and experiencing it fully. I cherish the sadness I feel when I think about and miss those I have lost, I wouldn’t ‘get over that’ for anything!

  • J

    JMc, you’re right…there are some things that should never be ‘gotten over’, like the loss of someone you love. The idea that I could ever be over the loss of my mom is absurd. I hadn’t thought of it that way, or I didn’t articulate it at least. I do like to think we can move on from some things, though, try to find a way to not let them poison our lives. Anger is one of these things, that I think is important and valid, but can be dangerous in the long run.

    Starshine, thanks. You’re right, knowing the right course of action is important toward healing.

  • ally bean

    Hi J. Remember me?

    I’m just starting to read blogs again, so I clicked on yours to see what’s up with you. I can see that so much has happened in your life. I’m sorry to hear about your mother. I’m glad that you didn’t sell your property and end up in financial difficulties. And I’m sorry to hear that you both lost your jobs in this lousy economy.

    That being said, I can’t agree with you more about how lame it is to ignore/avoid negativity in your life. Starshine is right. You have to experience it, process it and then learn from it. Living a life of denial isn’t living, imho.

    • J

      Yay! Ally Bean, I’ve missed your blog. If you ever decide to start up again, let me know. Nice to have some time off, though, huh?

  • Rain

    I agree with what you said and can’t add anything to it. We need the freedom to sometimes be depressed, sometimes mad and so often we have people uncomfortable with that. I do think it’s damaging our culture

  • Dad Who Writes

    I love Ehrenreich’s books and I have the same suspicions about the relentless rise of “positive psychology”. It feels a little too close for comfort to that kind of religion thy blames people fo being poor because they have the wrong “attitude”

  • ybonesy

    It’s about balance, I think. I love the idea of positive thinking, and I am an optimist by nature, and I do think that negative thinking can have detrimental effects. BUT, I would never rationalize things being the way they were just because that’s destiny…and what can I do to change it anyway…so why should I try? Ugh, that sounds like such defeatism to me.